this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
20 points (85.7% liked)

Smart Homes

636 readers
6 users here now

For the discussion of smart homes, home automation and the like. Because of the instance it will tend to have a more UK flavour but everyone is welcome.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

Rules:

NB: looking for moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Especially in recent years, Google’s efforts in the smart home have received continued criticism, but looking at the current state of the Google Home app and Nest hardware, is that still deserved?

...

That’s basically where I stand at this point. Google Nest is full of shortcomings, absolutely, but it’s also one of the only simple smart home camera offerings out there that isn’t bogged down by awful software, higher fees, or complicated setup/maintenence. I’ve been vocal about my issues with Nest over the past few years, but I’m overall reasonably satisfied, and I don’t hesitate to tell folks who ask about home cameras to give Nest their consideration.

Should Nest still work to improve? Absolutely.

There’s so much room to improve, as the very vocal community of users made clear during this week’s AMA. I, for one, hope Google’s team read each and every one of those comments and took them to heart. But, like many of those users, I’ve also been burned by Google on the smart home. I still hate that feature parity isn’t a thing in the Home app (without some ridiculously complex workarounds). I’m still frustrated at poorly thought through choices on newer Nest Cams. I’m still trying to find a good security system to replace my Nest Secure that’s dying for no good reason.

But every time I look elsewhere, I have the same thought: is it really so bad?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Everyone seems to hate the Google Home app and Nest, should they?

Betteridge's Law of Headlines suggests the answer is "no" and yet...

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've noticed recently it seems like journos have started deliberately subverting Betteridge’s Law.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 7 points 7 months ago

I suppose it's subtle clickbait - you come in expecting a hut piece and it's more nuanced than that.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's not like it's a law of nature – it's just a quip that is often true, but is also often used to blithely dismiss an article without reading it because hur de dur Betteridge