this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
29 points (91.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9629 readers
467 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure if this is the right place to post this, but i really like how calm the street scenes are without cars. There's also a 1902 / now comparison video which is kind of depressing, i thought i'd rather post something nice :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FatLegTed@piefed.social 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

That's excellent. Pity we don't make more use of things like that now.

Oops, just looked at the other link!

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The situations where such infrastructure technologies make sense as the best option are pretty rare. Wuppertal had the unique combination of circumstances with:

  • a decently well-connected inventor and a supportive emperor
  • the urban/metropolitan area being in a narrow valley along the river Wupper
  • steep hillsides poorly suited for rail
  • geology poorly suited for tunnelling with late 1800's technology
  • local steel industry
  • the ability to use the river as the right of way
  • the relative infancy of electric railway propulsion

This all contributed to a suspended railway making a lot of sense in that case.

Today, an average problem can be satisfactorily addressed with a form of conventional rail in most situations.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Monorails are usually not the most practical solution. In most places where you can build a monorail, a regular train is usually simpler and cheaper to build. Wuppertal has some very specific geography which causes a monorail following the path of the river Wupper to make sense, but that often doesn't translate well to other places.

Tom Scott made a video about it at some point:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4KZLcvMQWg

And a video on the Schwebebahn by The Tim Traveller:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IFh6wFTJiQ