this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
210 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
489 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago (22 children)

'Reading my book infringes on my copyright.' say confused writers.

[–] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 59 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is a strawman.

You cannot act as though feeding LLMs data is remotely comparable to reading.

[–] Gatsby@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because reading is an inherently human activity.

An LLM consuming data from a training model is not.

[–] TheBurlapBandit@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LLMs forcing us to take a look at ourselves and see if we're really that special.

I don't think we are.

[–] Dominic@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

For now, we're special.

LLMs are far more training data-intensive, hardware-intensive, and energy-intensive than a human brain. They're still very much a brute-force method of getting computers to work with language.

[–] Pips@lemmy.film 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the LLM is also outputting the copyrighted material.

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

So could any human that got inspired by something...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)