this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
245 points (98.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
3419 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Will you be the one to be deciding who can and cannot have kids then? Will sterilizations be optional? Or will they be mandatory for undesirables only? Every study ahows that simply providing decent food and home security results in decreased in birth rates.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you'll re-read my comment, you'll notice that I put the onus on people as a whole and not some group that would make the decisions.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hey, you're the one saying he wants 7.2 billion people to die, take some responsibility and tell us who should be first into the camps.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why do people assume that talking about reducing population by lowering birthrates always jump to mass murder? Idk, maybe it's just a severe lack of reading comprehension or critical thinking...

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because when you're talking about reducing population "to 10%" you sound like a genocidal ghoul. Work on your own critical thinking and maybe consider acquiring a modicum of common sense.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I read the original comment, and they never said to kill anyone. As an example if people only had 1 kid per person, that would eventually drop the population by 50%, then keep going. This is just an example, and a peaceful one.

They never said anything about killing or genocide, nor did they imply it. Maybe you lack common sense.

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You'll prevent the birth of trillions of people because of that. Monster! /S

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We all die eventually. Nothing wrong with that. If I learned anything in DiffEq it's that uncontrolled growth will eventually blow up the model or find some mode of control.

Reducing human population will be a painful process and we're already seeing the beginning of it. People don't need to be killed to reduce population by 10%.

Birth rate needs to be smaller than death rate.

There are lots of things that effect birth and death rate.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

He said "to 10%" not "by 10%", meaning he thinks we should reduce population by 7.2 billion people. That requires more than statistical differences. That requires mass death.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago