this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)

Opensource

1334 readers
40 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] canpolat@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that is relevant from author's (and OSI's) point of view.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Which is why I say they live in their land of make believe. It's great to preach principles when you're not the one impacted sticking to them.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] canpolat@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I don't follow your reasoning. Why would a company not making money be a relevant problem for the advocates of FOSS? FOSS is about freedom. It never had an opinion about money. Money has always been irrelevant. Some people may not like it, and they are free to not use non-free licenses. And FOSS advocates will warn users about that (as they did in the past). FOSS doesn't have an obligation to offer a solution to every problem in the software industry.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Money has always been irrelevant.

This is the point. In the real world, money matters. Comments from an org like OSI on companies not being principled are akin to the church making comments on abortion. To these orgs it's a black and white issue: either you adhere to their beliefs and are "good" or you don't and you are "evil".

Articles like these sound like out of touch preachers screaming about queers and family values. And people who blindly follow them with no arguments but "it was written by X" or "it's written in Y" are just appealing to authority.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] canpolat@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's an unnecessarily strong reaction. Money clearly matters for some things. But that's not all that matters. There are many people releasing FOSS without any financial expectations. Clearly, money doesn't matter to those people on that context. Trying to argue that "money should matter also for those people on that context" doesn't make too much sense to me. Nobody is forcing anybody to release FOSS.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, you're missing the point and I don't know how to bring it across. It's best we end this here as it's going nowhere.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0