this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
317 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
321 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (23 children)

The most dangerous part of the journey is still the drive to and from the airport (except for lucky folks like me who have mass transit options).

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago (17 children)

Right, but I'm driving the car and responsible for maintenance. I can mitigate some of the risk, and have insight into the level of risk.

When I get in a plane, I want absolute confidence in the competence of the pilot and crew. I want to know that the plane has been inspected and certified, and the maintenance logged and triple checked.

Finding out that my confidence was misplaced, that the manufacturer has been cutting corners related to safety and structural integrity, that's a deal breaker for me. An auto manufacturer can regain trust with a new model car that fixes previous defects. Airplanes are in service for decades, and you don't always know what plane you'll get until you are at the gate. Airlines will avoid buying new Boeing aircraft, which will drive down the prices, which will encourage further cost-eaving measures at the expense of quality assurance.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The more important difference is that the plane cannot pull over in the event of an engine or steering malfunction. Everything needs to continue working for the aircraft to continue its defiance of gravity.

[–] Vortieum@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Not necessarily true. Quite a bit can fail (including engine and steering systems) on a modern aircraft and it will still safely defy gravity.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)