Privacy

31935 readers

780 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

295

YouTube is severely rate limiting Invidious instances (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 7 months ago by anticurrent@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Today most Invidious instances are experiencing very harsh ip address rate limiting, it is becoming very very hard to watch yt videos through

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not really, what it needs is a strong niche community with some reach

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Exactly. For any proposed change, it's going to run up against what I like to call Status Quo Extremism, which is a mindset that suggests that "But that would be different from the status quo" counts as a defeater argument against proposed changes.

The combination of incentives would, as you note, need to be driven by niche interests rather than attempting to reproduce the incentives of the top 0.01% of YouTube creators.