this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
277 points (99.3% liked)

196

16449 readers
2194 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
277
R(ul)evenge USA edition (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

The discourse on American politics sometimes devolves to "Leftists who won't vote" & "MAGA Republicans" teaming up to "getting revenge on liberals".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 7 months ago (10 children)

Alright, but it's not really about you, is it? There's untold many hungry people, some of which are allergic to peanuts, and the only crate left has nothing but.

There are several people needed to open the crate. Maybe it can be opened without you, maybe it can't maybe it's stuck regardless. But even if you don't want peanuts, it's incredibly selfish of you to not only refuse to help feed the people who can be fed but also pretend to be of upstanding moral character when you do so. So take an antacid and show up at the ballot.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago (6 children)

There's untold many hungry people in the world because our comfort depends on it. In fact, what a wild metaphor to continue using when there's thousands starving to death in Palestine right now with our tax money. Hey, but at least we'll get cheap oil shipped to us through that new India>Saudi Arabia>Palestine trade route that's being set up as a competitor to the "new Silk Road" thing china is doing. Cheap oil might be that peanut butter sandwich that people over here need to stay financially afloat, but it's only a few layers removed from your actions being responsible for genocide. Some people don't like this fact and would rather we had actual representation in our government.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

because our comfort depends on it

That's not actually relevant to the discussion; dismantling the United States, capitalism, and/or all imperialism isn't on the table.

If you want to have a birthday cake, and you see Timmy about to start playing with a loaded gun, you should still stop that from happening even if it doesn't get you birthday cake. That's especially true if there's no birthday cake readily available.

Edit: the more I think about it, the better an analogy this is, because if >!little Timmy blows his brains out after you chose not to stop it, it seriously hampers the ammount of birthday cake you eat in the future. Because if there's birthday cake available you probably won't be able to eat it after that, people will be less likely to invite you to a birthday party, and little Timmy won't have any more birthdays.!<

CW: casual discussion of graphic and dark topics.

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago

People are upset they can't vote to dismantle the system and so they don't vote thinking that it somehow withdraws their consent. I feel like that Patrick's wallet meme where we all agree voting doesn't do the things we want, including withdrawing consent.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)