this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
92 points (94.2% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
268 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Anarchists don't fight for a world with zero authority. They fight for a world that has justified authority. If you say, "well lots of things don't require authority that people swear is necessary!" Yes, that's why it's an entire axiom and not a childish thought.

Learn what political ideologies even want before you attempt to insult them.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

justified authority

I think 'organization without authority' would be a better way to put it.

It sounds like you probably mean that, I just think that for a lot of anarchists 'authority' is a bad word. I don't call myself an anarchist, but I agree with a lot of anarchist thought. Certainly to me 'justified authority' sounds like a contradiction in terms - all authority is based on artificial and unjust hierarchies, so could never be justified.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Right, organization does not require authority, it requires coordination. Authority's only purpose is to coerce other's behavior, this is what is to be avoided in an anarchist society.

Anarchism can still have leaders, but they would lead voluntary teams because they are respected and capable of coordination, not because they are powerful.