this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
627 points (89.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7203 readers
316 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. As a Bernie supporter, though, I got a heck of a lot of pressure to “do my duty” even in the primary, because “we have to nominate the candidate who has the best chance of winning.” The shitshow is doing everything it can to move upstream.

[–] synergyviolator@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This drives me bonkers. The candidate who has the best chance of winning is the one that gets people talking and actually interested in voting. It’s not like there’s a cage match between the candidates and it’s not like the debates actually matter in terms of who wins. Votes are what wins. Votes are caused by interest. Interest is caused by lots of things but it’s not by making sure the milquetoast center right “progressive” candidate is the one who makes it to the main event.

The other side isn’t going to vote for “our” candidate no matter what. We need to get “our” side actually interested in voting. The number of people who vote in this country is pathetic to begin with. It completely defeats the legitimacy of our elections from the off.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Sanders won in polls vs Trump. Clinton lost. The party just decided they'd rather Trump be president than Sanders.