I think using both is normal. Closures and objects are duals of each other. Do whatever is understandable and maintainable, neither paradigm is magic.

[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 months ago

that's a nice way to look at it. thanks!

[–] kogasa@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is the duality statement meant to be true in a technical sense?

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah! For example, if the language allows closures to capture state, they can act like properties on an instance.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't see the duality

[–] jendrik@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago

A closure is a function with captured state. An object is state with methods.