this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
386 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38553 readers
3142 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] athos77@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The researcher points out that births “will increasingly be concentrated in the areas of the world that are most vulnerable to climate change, resource scarcity, political instability, poverty and infant mortality.”

Well, this can only end well ...

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -1 points 6 months ago

Having 0-2 happy children vs having 8-12 children running around dirty, hungry and naked.

Yup. People naturally choose the former if they can, but a country with fewer people is weaker and may become poorer.

So it's a government's job to make it affordable to have children.

This part of reality is explained best via logic which may seem a bit fascist, but it does exist. It's not a good thing to be eaten.