this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
42 points (93.8% liked)

Apple

17451 readers
172 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
MichelleG@lemmy.world
thisisdee@lemmy.world
RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world
42
Apple Is in Talks to Let Google’s Gemini Power iPhone Generative AI Features (www.bloomberg.com)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by fer0n@lemmy.world to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The two companies are in active negotiations to let Apple license Gemini, Google’s set of generative AI models, to power some new features coming to the iPhone software this year, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the deliberations are private. Apple also recently held discussions with OpenAI and has considered using its model, according to the people.

Edit: Apple in Talks With Google to Bring Gemini AI Features to iPhone (macrumors, no paywall)

[…] According to Gurman, however, Apple is focusing on features that operate on-device and do not require an internet connection. To power additional cloud-based generative AI features, such as the ability to create images and write essays based on single prompts, Apple is seeking a partner that has the necessary large-scale hardware infrastructure and compute capabilities already in place.

According to previous reporting by Gurman, Apple has been internally testing an "Apple GPT" rival that could compete with OpenAI's ChatGPT […]. However, the technology is still not as advanced as tools from Google and other rivals, making a partnership look like the better option, according to the latest report.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So, I have a firm anti-Google stance. I won’t use anything that has their involvement. So, looks like I’m getting a PinePhone.

[–] DavidGA@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You’re insane.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, just hilariously unaware of the PinePhone's limitations - and so is everyone who down voted you.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It was more of a joke. There’s nothing else but iOS at this point.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

GrapheneOS also works somewhat.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

My favorite quality in a device…

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It would be a tempting choice if forced to use Android, but leaving iOS for GrapheneOS (Android) would be a step in the wrong direction.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actually, GrapheneOS would be a significant step in a better direction, even before Gemini gets added to the iOS equation.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee -4 points 7 months ago

GrapheneOS is Android. And using Android at all is supporting Google. Even if it’s de-googled. Just like using any chromium browser. Although, it does look like a good choice for Android users.