this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
43 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
379 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought they were illegal under international law. Looks like they aren't. Maybe I'm thinking of cluster mines. The benefit better outweigh the cost. That's a tricky equation.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought they were illegal under international law.

The article said that 100 countries have signed a treaty to ban them but the US is not one of those countries. This CBC article talks a bit about why countries have banned them. It's a bomb that sprays smaller bombs randomly over a large area. The main issue is these smaller bombs might not detonate on impact and will only explode later on once the war is long over with.

[–] Epilektoi_Hoplitai@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

the US is not one of those countries.

It's interesting to look at the map of signatories.

Canada, Europe, Japan, and most of Latin America and Africa are signatories, while almost the whole of the Middle East and Eurasia + Brazil, Russia, India, China are not.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they are a similar post war problem as landmines which also have a treaty that the US has not signed.