this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
511 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3590 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Which is also not rape. I'm not defending gaetz here, hes a fucking huge piece of trash. I'm just explaining to anyone who comes here why they aren't using the term rape.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Once you trafficked the person across state lines, it can become a federal matter and the definitions of statutory rape, those of the federal definitions, not the ones in Florida. Or in either state, the one of origin or one of destination. this is because the rape charge can become an accessory charge to the trafficking charge. It all depends on the manner in which Gaetz is charged in these cases.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Can you direct me to the federal law that would make this rape?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Depends on whether you're talking about rape as a legal definition or a violation of a universal understanding of consent.

It obviously doesn't make sense that having sex with a 17 year old in one state isn't rape when it would be in a different state, but that is the law. A bad one.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't the fact that you recognize the law varies from state to state kind of disprove your claim of "universal understanding"?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

1: Tell me more about how you want to fuck teenagers

2: It's very clearly a hypothetical being advanced to make the reader consider exactly that the belief isn't universal

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I won't lie. I see plenty of underage women that I find physically attractive. I find it hard to believe any man has never seen a minor that they find physically attractive. However, there are few I find intellectually or emotionally attractive... and precisely zero I would actually have sex with.

I don't see what that has to do with the law or your claim it's universally accepted that having sex with someone under 18 is rape.

I don't follow point 2. The only way I can interpret it is that you are saying your point was actually the opposite of your point.

[–] rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, it fucking is. It's very blatantly rape. Imagine being the guy who argues that trafficking a teenage girl to fuck her isn't rape. You're fucking disgusting and you definitely are defending Gaetz here. There's no other reason to post this bullshit.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I'm explaining why they don't use rape in the headline. If facts and reason while also thinking gaetz is pure scum is defending gaetz, well I can't reason you out of a position you didn't reason yourself into.