this post was submitted on 31 May 2022
24 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34795 readers
285 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

reddit comments

There are several oversimplifications to watch out, but still interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MRLimcon@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Here in Brazil, this system exists, but without a blockchain, and it works very well. It tracks vaccinations, surgeries, when you went to a hospital or a basic health unit (it's like a mini hospital for check-ups, vaccination and less severe stuff), etc.

I went to a doctor recently (that I never went before) and he started asking things like "so you broke your arm on 2003? Interesting".

So I would say that blockchain might not help in that area either haha.

[–] OhScee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah there's not really a need that it fulfills that something already existing doesn't already do better lol

[–] ailiphilia@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What dies "better" mean? If everything is stored on a single server owned by this one company in Mountain View or so, is it better then?

[–] OhScee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the problem with that argument is that you're implying that blockchain maintainers are infallible which we know is also not true

it's the issue of reinventing the wheel. Do we have a solution that is more energy efficient and affordable for the average user to participate in? yes.

[–] ailiphilia@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nothing and no one is ever infallible. What I say is that the web as we know it is broken in that it has become a walled garden controllled by a few companies. And, yes, a lot of web3 doesn't appear to change that, it's just old wine in new bottles. We needed to discuss alternatives to different use case (payment and currency systems, how we monetize apps and other products, data hosting and sharing,. ..). Energy efficiency and affordability are important issues, but I want to have choice and don't want to become dependent on 5 or so companies in whatever I do. If that means that I have to pay,, I'd be fine with that.

[–] OhScee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you are literally on a federated platform that does not use blockchain. this seems like the resolution to that issue

[–] ailiphilia@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, that's one solution for a specific use case (-: