this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13001 readers
14 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
7
Solar panels could be about to get much better at capturing sunlight (www.newscientist.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Spudger@lemmy.sdf.org to c/science@beehaw.org
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Could*

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Klinkertinlegs@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I like that they put “could” in there. A lot of articles claim improvements “are” coming to solar or battery, then it never happens.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

M8, this is science, we're on c/science. Something that can do something but isn't verified in a specific environment is a "could". This is how literally every single advancement is made.

So I'm rather confused why it's distasteful to have a feed of new information that we didn't know before. Which is scientific news.

[–] Helix@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't claim it's distasteful, quite the opposite.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I suppose tone is rather difficult on the internet (see: Poe's Law). To me the tone was one of distaste/unsatisfaction with the "could". As if OP is upset that hey keep seeing "could" but no actual implementation.