this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
85 points (90.5% liked)

Games

16752 readers
829 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
85
WB Thinks ‘Hogwarts Legacy 2’ Should Be A Live Service (www.forbes.com)
submitted 8 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SteefLem@lemmy.world 85 points 8 months ago (1 children)

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seriously. There isn't a single live service thing I enjoy. Windows 11 has a bunch of live service integrations, one of which effectively bricked my gaming laptop because Microsoft can't be assed to git revert a change to their website. I'm rocking Linux now and not looking back.

[–] SteefLem@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Live service if done right can work. Problem is these companies do the absolute minimum and that just doesnt work. Like most thing they have to put some effort in it, but hey that costs money and thats a no no So im not necessary against live service but knowing these companies just do fuck all, then well just No

[–] Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Let’s call Live Service what it really is, company hosted anti-piracy because they don’t want to pay/implement Denuvo

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

That's just always online. Live Service is milking customers for more money on top of the already full priced game, because just releasing a product that's good and is the best selling game of that year wasn't profitable enough for the vampires at the top of the company.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Right. Wasn't Overwatch considered live service? I put tons of hours into it before they shut it down permanently.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I put tons of hours into it before they shut it down permanently.

Which is one of the major problems with Live Service. Sure, not everyone plays older games, but I know I have a number of titles I return to regularly. Hell, one of my favorite games of all times was released in 1989 and I still go back an re-play it from time to time. Any game which releases as "Live Service" and requires an always on-line connection to some server which I don't host can go eat a bag of dicks.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Hell, if they can at least be decent enough to ALLOW self-hosting servers, that'd be great