this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
137 points (68.2% liked)

Fediverse

17535 readers
75 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I really want to nip threads in the bud. Besides blocking threads.net itself, defederate from any instances that do not. This is blatantly an EEE strategy and a united front is the only way to save what have been accomplished. Here is how Indivudals can do it on mastodont as an example to follow. https://hachyderm.io/@crowgirl/110663465238573628 Edit found this , https://fedipact.online/ please sign.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (12 children)
[–] RxBrad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Yes, I know.. But there's no need for Meta to extinguish Mastodon if we do it ourselves?

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)
[–] Syrup@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem to be stretching the definition of the "paradox of tolerance" in new and amazing ways. How exactly does the "paradox of tolerance" relate to defederating from instances that haven't explicitly blocked Threads?

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How exactly does the “paradox of tolerance” relate to defederating from instances that haven’t explicitly blocked Threads?

it applies to federation of single units in same way as it applies to single unit. if we decide this is a direction we want to take, then everyone has to think about which side of the imaginary barricade they want to stand on.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)