this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

UK Nature and Environment

379 readers
25 users here now

General Instance Rules:

Community Specific Rules:

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A report has called on ministers to scrap the huge subsidies and tax breaks given to conifer forests because they do too little to combat the climate crisis.

The report from the Royal Society of Edinburgh said the tens of millions of pounds in subsidies given to the timber industry should instead be spent on longer-living native forests, which have greater and clearer climate and biodiversity benefits.

It said the Scottish and UK governments are wrong to argue that public subsidies are needed to help plant more, larger conifer forests. These plantations are largely monocultures using a single species that have a relatively short lifespan.

Instead, public subsidies should be diverted to planting millions of native broadleaf trees, including in urban areas, which capture and keep more CO2, support more plant and animal species, store more carbon in the soil, and have a far longer lifespan.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

They’re actually not better than nothing, they monoculture spruce forests effectively prevent wildlife from coming back and the farming of it prevents biodiversity.

It’s like a field of corn as far as benefit for the environment is concerned. It’s a benefit for lumber interests though