this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
1395 points (93.7% liked)

tumblr

3307 readers
11 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He had a huge margin in the House, a super-majority in the Senate, and he chose to pass the Heritage Foundation's Healthcare proposal. Clinton didn't even have that majorities like that his first term. If Obama couldn't get that congress to cooperate he wasn't fit to lead.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He lost the super majority very quickly, and it was rarely an effective supermajority. Having 60 geriatric men in a room at one time is hard. Byrd was in the hospital, and frankin had been denied his seat for months. By the time the aca passed they'd lost the "super" part of the majority anyway.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I'm pretty sure that the ACA passed before Scott Brown took office, which as I remeber it was the end of his Super Majority. But even if I'm wrong, then why don't they end the filibuster? If the Republicans are determined to be the obstructionist party, why aren't the willing to limit their ability to obstruct? They've been willing to do it to get nominations through, so why won't they do it to pass legislation?

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Someone being the same party doesn't mean they will co-operate.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah, again, he had 60 in the senate, a big majority in the house, and a huge mandate from the voters. If he couldn't pass his legislation under those circumstances he wasn't fit to lead.