this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
558 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

4360 readers
2334 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Auduras@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree, usually this isn't the case. IMO the other example of this is with Jurassic Park.

[–] RabbePompano@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I recently read Jurassic Park for the first time and I thought the same thing. The movie provided a more engaging plot, had more emotional punch, and developed stronger characterization. Going back and reading Chrichton's work has been a rewarding exercise to me as a budding writer. He had some great ideas but also surprisingly had a lot of flaws in his work.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 8 months ago

The best part of the book was making Hammond the villain, that should have been kept.