this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
287 points (96.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7212 readers
502 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Mexican government is seeking billions of dollars in damages for arms suppliers' role in cross-border gun trafficking.


The government of Mexico is suing U.S. gun-makers for their role in facilitating cross-border gun trafficking that has supercharged violent crime in Mexico.

The lawsuit seeks US$10 billion in damages and a court order to force the companies named in the lawsuit – including Smith & Wesson, Colt, Glock, Beretta and Ruger – to change the way they do business. In January, a federal appeals court in Boston decided that the industry’s immunity shield, which so far has protected gun-makers from civil liability, does not apply to Mexico’s lawsuit.

As a legal scholar who has analyzed lawsuits against the gun industry for more than 25 years, I believe this decision to allow Mexico’s lawsuit to proceed could be a game changer. To understand why, let’s begin with some background about the federal law that protects the gun industry from civil lawsuits.

read more: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/mexico-is-suing-us-gun-makers-for-arming-its-gangs-and-fueling-extreme-violence/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No it's not, that stat was during the pandemic when driving around was drastically reduced, and it doesn't help that they include children to be 1 to 19...guess which stat falls into the 15-19 yo crowd? Gang violence/homicides. Of which is where the majority of our overall violence and firearm homicides come from.

So no, go read some statistics before spouting off bullshit. More children die from drowning each year than killed by the legislation that wants to ban "assault weapons".

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

COVID had the opposite effect, as this article covers. Motor vehicle deaths rose following a fairly steady decline over the past twenty years. Gun deaths just rose as at a higher pace, going from third following cancer to first.

But just comparing cause of death misses the point, really: this is not a phenomena that peer countries experience. While this has become somewhat accepted as the norm in the US, there's no real reason we ever had to let it get this bad.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

As might be expected, teenagers have higher firearm mortality rates than children. In the U.S., teens ages 18 and 19 have a firearm mortality rate of 25.2 per 100,000, compared to a rate of 3.7 per 100,000 for children ages 1-17 in the U.S.

As I said, gang violence.

And again it's higher because not as many people where driving, is why firearm deaths rose during the pandemic, I didn't say they dropped.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/2022-deadliest-children-killed-traffic-235000356.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADA6TGT3hrJQdWLVm_DRywfQIqZ3p4gzK7n51ayq2yZ5TvQ3-FWija5klqZ3O_ZC7bCE2_HZMw1pVmleVT3gYUSOHlXsA2pYVzPepzPpV3ftxXJJVMRgpfqAw4Br2ZcIPzcQxYIDx7rsd8GTJBBxM2Uym9cedfRLwwDrS_xMVNxD