this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
268 points (99.6% liked)

Work Reform

10009 readers
303 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/12307563

A UK study shows work intensity remains lower and job satisfaction is higher during a four-day workweek.

The majority of companies in the United Kingdom that took part in the world’s largest study trialling a four-day workweek have made the policy permanent, with 100 per cent of managers and CEOs saying it had a “positive” impact on the organisation.

Some 61 organisations took part in the six-month pilot in 2022. The trial results were announced on Thursday with 89 per cent of companies still using the four-day workweek a year later and over half of the firms making the change permanent.

The study also showed that work intensity remains lower and job satisfaction is higher than before the pilot began with almost all the employees (96 per cent) saying their personal life had benefited, and 86 per cent said they felt they performed better at work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a perfectly reasonable solution... do you think the restaurant managers that try their damnedest to avoid paying waiters a livable wage and are statistically the most likely employers to commit wage theft or tax fraud - as well as advocating for tipping culture to again try and minimize compensation - do you think they're likely to be on board with a solution that makes shift rotas more complicated? Or do you think they'll continue to try and keep every waiter at exactly 39 hours technically not qualifying as an FTE on the books with duties like tear down being considered off shift?

I don't think this is a reason not to push for 8-4 but I partially agree with the much downvoted comment above that this schedule won't roll out at the same time for everyone.

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I 1000% agree, the asset class won't give up their wealth. But to say it won't happen because it's not possible is wrong.

It won't happen because a small minority of ludicrously privileged individuals, who treat the Forbes Billionaires list as a leaderboard, are too fucking greedy to only live an amazingly luxurious life instead of a ultra super duper amazingly luxurious life.

I think it's downvoted because of a defeatist attitude. I agree with the highly downvoted top comment on a factual level, I'm not sure who wouldn't