this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
238 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

34438 readers
201 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] transmatrix@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wonder if Zuckerberg employed former Twitter devs on Thread work. Would be another hilarious example of Musk shooting himself in the foot.

[–] Nollij@lemmy.fmhy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

That's pretty likely, given how many have left in the past year, and it's possibly a very big problem for Meta. Apple in their early days infamously asked candidates if they were "virgins". It was not (as Hollywood likes to portray) about their sexual history, but whether they had ever touched or seen IBM's proprietary code. Apple needed to do a clean-room development and implementation of the same thing. They knew IBM would sic the lawyers on them, and they had to prove they did it using nothing but publicly available info.

The article has absolutely no detail on what these trade secrets might be, or if they will be upheld in court, so we can only speculate. But if these really are trade secrets, and Meta poached them, then we could be talking serious damages or even an injunction.

But knowing the courts, this won't actually be decided for years and it won't even matter by then

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Judge: And what forms of inducement did he use to hire them away?

Elon: Uh, well your honor, after I fired them all, he offered them stable employment?

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Per the article Meta claims no ex-Twitter employees worked on Threads.

[–] Marxine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They've probably served as "consultants" at the bare minimum though

[–] jon@lemmy.tf 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably, it'd be pretty stupid not to put his ex-Twitter engineers on the Threads projects. But it's entirely legal to have your employees work on something close to what they did at their last job. I'd be very, very surprised if Meta knowingly allowed stolen IP to be incorporated into their new product, Musk needs to provide some evidence to back his claims.