this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
1657 points (96.1% liked)

Work Reform

10030 readers
377 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fal@yiffit.net 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Owners make passive income with the wealth they already have

And there's different degrees. More than half the US population own stock. Is someone who makes $200 a year via investments "owning class"? What about $20,000? $2,000,000? You see how there's vastly different scales? That's what the definition of middle class is and why it's important and meaningful

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Your distinction is answered in the post you replied to.

If getting fired from your job puts your basic necessities at risk, you are working class.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not just about owning, it's about living off what you own. You have to work to live? Working class. You live from passive income? Owner. As you can see, middle class definition is not meaningful in this conversation. In other contexts, sure it matters, but not here

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So everyone who retires transitions from the working class to the owner class?

I'm not sure it's that useful to say that a 70 year old retired engineer is owner class because they're living off of the stock market returns of their 401k.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, that's just called retirement

[–] Fal@yiffit.net 3 points 9 months ago

So what about someone who retires in their 30s?