this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1005 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3962 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fox News reported on some new presidential rankings, which purportedly show Barack Obama as the #6 president in U.S. history and Donald Trump dead last, and MAGA was not happy.

Fox News on Sunday posted an article about the new rankings by the Presidential Greatness Project, which Fox describes as "a group of self-styled experts." It states that Abraham "Lincoln topped the list of presidents in the 2024 Presidential Greatness Project expert survey for the third time, following his top spot in the rankings in the 2015 and 2018 versions of the survey."

...

"Rounding out the top five in the rankings were Franklin Delano Roosevelt at number two, George Washington at three, Theodore Roosevelt at four, and Thomas Jefferson at five," according to the report. "Trump was ranked in last place in the survey, being ranked worse than James Buchanan at 44, Andrew Johnson at 43, Franklin Pierce at 42, and William Henry Harrison at 41."

The report states that Obama and Joe Biden "ranked an average of 6th and 13th, respectively, among Democrat respondents, and 15th and 30th by Republicans."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 157 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Trump is the most damaging traitor in American history.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Trump sucks but Benedict Arnold sucked so much his name became synonymous with traitor.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 53 points 8 months ago
[–] frezik@midwest.social 18 points 8 months ago

The Revolution managed to succeed anyway. We're still not sure our democracy (flawed as it is) can survive Trump.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Benedict Arnold got in a position to be traitor by being a war hero. Even as a traitor , he followed his conscience.

Trump got in his position by being a real estate grifter, playing shell games with New York City real estate, hiding income to take multiple properties through bankruptcy while having a positive income, not paying contractors and employees, etc. Out of vanity he paid to host his own “reality” show then somehow stumbled into connecting with half the population through outrage and misdirection who nevertheless elected him president. Somehow this narcissistic incompetent bombastic sleazy salesman commanded enough popular support for the Republican Party to worship at his feet, be afraid to contradict his words. Somehow this treasonous buffoon spouts sexist garbage worse than what got Clinton impeached but that’s ok, supports our Cold War enemy and current yet people are ok with it, reduces government services while enriching himself and his family, incites an attempt to circumvent the election but people still want to choose him, actually says he will act as a dictator yet there’s still support, damaged the ability of our government to function but that’s cool, started trade wars out of spite or impulse yet no one objects, then there’s the matter of hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths by contradicting his own public health advisors on how to handle an epidemic

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

So eventually I can expect there to be a kickass way to cook eggs named after Trump?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 29 points 8 months ago (5 children)

If you serve me something trump-style, I will assume it is overpriced, poorly made, and possibly not even food.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The irony is that 'trump' used to mean overcoming, or offering something better than the previous offer. Originated from the word 'triumph'. The common term was 'trump card', but it's also a verb. In all cases, it was a positive idea.

Now I can't even bring myself to use it during card games.

[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

In the UK, 'trump' means fart.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago

And that you didn't pay whoever made them.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago
[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

And made by someone that isn't going to get paid.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Don't forget the side of hair

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Nah, it's gonna be Steak Trump, which is just any steak with McDonald's ketchup on it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago
[–] kittyjynx@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I took to calling a well done steak with ketchup "Presidential".

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well done steak is understandable for older folks raised in a tiny town. My mom eats it well done because they didn't even have fridges. Better make sure it's well cooked so you don't get sick. Some people cook it beyond well done where it's getting into charcoal territory, that plus ketchup is what I call ala trump.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This doesn't describe me but I prefer my steaks well done. The thing is, it's harder to do a well done steak right than most other levels of done-ness because there's less leeway (basically there's a wide spread where something is medium rare, but a fine line between well done and shoe leather). Usually the trick is to stop cooking it shortly before you think it's actually done and then let it rest covered to finish from the residual heat.

The ketchup thing is just gross though. Mix a bit of red wine, worcestershire, soy sauce, garlic, onion and store-bought steak sauce and cook it a bit to let the wine reduce, let everything mix and thicken it a bit.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Nah it would be one of the souls of the thousands of unsold sneakers with ketchup on it.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Trump Eggs : rotten to the yolk.

(And small. Very small.)

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

If by 'kickass' you mean 'shirred in shit', yeah.

[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

think of it this way. noone outside America knows who that is.

everyone knows who Trump is

[–] CustodialTeapot@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

modern day media has a big impact on that, also you being part of that history.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Imagining: the British have a statue to Benedict Arnold with the inscription "loyal" on it that they throw a towel over every time American tourists walk by while innocently whistling

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Im not sure he's going to be alone in that category much longer

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't he actually very patriotic? He just hated the French that bad.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 8 months ago

The guys who won the Revolution for us?

Sounds like his "patriotism" was British.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Says the person not currently haunted by the spirit of Benedict Arnold's leg.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Benedict Donald sounds right

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Sure, he was a traitor for a period, and did some pretty horrible things during that time (such as the invasion of Quebec) but he did end up restoring his original loyalties eventually.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Go read about Benedict Arnold. He was actually kind of a hero iirc that fucked up.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He lost almost all his battles, picked a fight with every fellow officer around him, and committed treason because they wouldn't let him openly be a war profiteer, everyone else having the good sense to hide their corruption. His naked ambition, greed, and open jealousy are simple historical fact.

There's a fair enough point that losing battles and winning the war is just how the Revolution was, so he might well deserve more credit for military competence than his record implies, but Arnold did more than "make a mistake" by trying to sell West Point to the British.

Also, just fyi:

After defecting to the British he burned the city of New London to the ground and executed the garrison of Fort Grinswold after they surrendered.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Not even remotely. Without massive help from the Republican party, he would have gotten nothing accomplished. Despite being the second coming of Reagan. Even Reagan was far worse than Trump. The collective efforts of the Bush family over the last 100 years dwarf and are also part of Reagan's legacy.

Don't get me wrong. Trump is awful. The Republican party is the problem however. They could stop him at a moment's notice and kick him out. But they refuse to simply because their monster got away from them. And he's currently got control.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The Republican party is the problem however. They could stop him at a moment’s notice and kick him out.

So, we have a two party system because FPTP voting always collapses into one given enough time. But there's no requirement that those two parties be "Democrats" and "Republicans", especially not as you know them now.

The GOP is worried that Trump's cult is large enough that if they tried to boot him out directly that it would cause a massive party split of the sort that leads to a decade or so having three parties (and Democrats winning a lot because the right wing vote is split) until either the GOP or MAGA comes out on top and absorbs the other - and they aren't sure MAGA wouldn't win that in the end.

It's better for the GOP long term if they let him tucker himself out or ideally get criminally convicted of things that make him ineligible under 14A Sec 3 in the hopes they can fold much of the cult back into their numbers but keep them politically active. If he gets barred under 14A Sec 3 then the GOP can get cultists to vote for them under claims that they'll fix that, and then just not bother to.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's cynical thinking and it's untrue. He can do a lot of damage in the interim. It would be worse than 20 to 30 years in the wilderness. Especially seeing as a Democratic party isn't a solid cohesive group itself. It's already a coalition party. And if there were less pressure to force a lot of us together, we'd split into other parties ourselves and pursue goals that actually align with our beliefs. For a lot of people including myself. Democrats simply represent a slower, slightly more humane slide into fascism.

We're literally staring down the barrel at the end of democracy. As they try to play chicken with the lead addled losers they've engineered. Thinking to themselves "hey, maybe if we keep our heads down and keep enabling them we can be in charge of whatever is left someday" That shit isn't rational, or reasonable. Especially considering how many Democrats would sorely love to work with them again if they just kicked the greasy toad to the side of the road.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You’ve put the cart before the horse. It’s trump who controls the republicans. It’s the republicans who need him, not the other way around. It’s he who has co-opted them. And, no, Reagan, evil though he was, did not damage the Republic like Trump has. Bush, the insipid fool that he was, hasn’t attempted to bring down the Republic. Trump very nearly succeeded in doing that. In destroying America. And he very well might still achieve it.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Nope. Literally it isn't. They could kick him to the curb at any point. If he's controlling them, why did he do largely what they wanted in office. Yes they throw red meat to the morons too. But make no mistake as to who's in control. It's still the same wealthy people who were before.

All Trump has done is give the permission to openly be themselves. They're still the same crazies they were before he got in office.