Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
view the rest of the comments
You need to make it clear it's a hypothetical though. In your examples, it wasn't clear.
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. It was clear it was a hypothetical question, it wasn't clear - to refer to only the first example at the moment - they were including God's existence to be part of that hypothetical. If I said 'What if you met Donald Trump?' I wouldn't be claiming that Trump only exists in hypothetical scenarios, just that you meeting him only exists in such scenarios. Likewise in the first example, it is not clear that they are calling God's actual existence into question, but just your chance of meeting them.
As for the second example, it's the same thing. They are bundling a premise into the hypothetical, a premise (that the world will have humans in 50 years) that is not clearly hypothetical, and one that the commenter is thus permitted to disagree with in the comments.
I hope I have made myself clear, as it would be hypothetical if I didn't.