this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
560 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2146 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A White House spokesperson put it the best, I think:

The White House spokesperson Andrew Bates, when asked about Trump’s comments, said: “Encouraging invasions of our closest allies by murderous regimes is appalling and unhinged – and it endangers American national security, global stability and our economy at home.”

What's so insane about all this is that Trump saying something like that out loud means it's now practically gospel to the vast majority of GOP voters, and might as well be official party policy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EpicGamer@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The finnish and swiss did not agree, both concluded that the f-35 would be economally better over the entire lifespan of the planes. Buying a new plane requires you to look further than one month of flying

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If this is what makes you conclude the F-35 being a better system, you clearly have idea of what you're talking about. (NOT.)

Arms deals of that magnitude are based more on what politicians see as a chance of getting reelected than what the engineers conclude.

Furthermore, just looking at the specifications and conclude that A is better than B is something people without insight would do.

I recommend this Swedish blog post on the subject that was written 10 years ago: Gripen E vs JSF

[–] EpicGamer@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oke whatever dude buy the gripen have fun, I'll gladly buy the f-35. And I'll continue my life without insight haha wtf

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

No one is surprised.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Ahem, do you know how much fuckery goes on in military arms deals?