this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
23 points (92.6% liked)

Sociology

357 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/sociology!

Sociology is a social science that focuses on society, human social behavior, patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and aspects of culture associated with everyday life. In simple words sociology is the scientific study of society. It uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge about social order and social change. While some sociologists conduct research that may be applied directly to social policy and welfare, others focus primarily on refining the theoretical understanding of social processes and phenomenological method. Subject matter can range from micro-level analyses of society (i.e. of individual interaction and agency) to macro-level analyses (i.e. of social systems and social structure). Read more...


Rules


Links

Associations

Journals

Resources

Interesting Communities

Other Useful Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's very possible, I think the problem is I'm confused by their use of the word "myth".

When I hear full-time employment and men, I'm not aware of any myth that men are continously employed I think the of the societal standard that men must be continously employed. Rereading the paper, it still seems like they're sorting conflating things because they explicitly compare the men's employment to the fact that women "opt-out" of the workforce.

So to be clear, I'm not questioning the merit/validtiy of the study, but the way they've phrased their finding is odd (at the very least).

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I’m Gen X, so I’m part of the crossover generation.

My father’s father worked for the same company from the age of about 14 (by lying about his age) until retirement. He started as a kid sweeping glue residue off the top of shipping crates and ended as a union shop foreman. My other grandfather was a career soldier who moved from combat duty to overseas stationing in Germany and Japan to training officers in universities. My father worked in a single career for a single firm all of his life.

I, on the other hand, have had probably a half dozen different careers. Not employers - careers. I couldn’t even recall the number of employers I’ve had. And I’m even thinking about making one more switch before I call it done.

My grandparents (commercial or military) retired with full pensions that allowed them to live comfortably until the ends of their days. My partner and I are going to be relying on our retirement and other savings.

I think what the authors are talking about is generationally skewed. If you have an empty weekend and can suppress a gag reaction against racism, I suggest reading the Crichton novel Rising Sun. The movie is an alternative, but doesn’t really capture the existential terror that the novel does. Its value is in providing an insight into the American perception of reality at the time, as the economy transformed from lifetime employment at a company to what became the modern version of hopping around, either voluntarily or because the companies themselves are seeing employees as temps. I think the authors, whether or not they harbor the outdated insights to whatever degree, are speaking to that phenomenon. I just think you’re right in pointing out it’s outdated by about 20 years.

The 80s were like 20 years ago, right?