this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
147 points (95.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12200 readers
657 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drislands@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well put! And it's funny, I feel like I'm seeing Dworkin referenced everywhere since I saw Contrapoints' recent-ish video on JKR.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure that's just a coincidence, and that anyone who mentions Dworkin is just very well read.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's the sense I'm getting -- that she's a great source often-cited. I figured I was most likely just experiencing Baader-Meinhof.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

Andrea dworkin has some incredible points. And some that are a lot less palatable for modern feminists.

I personally find her to be an often misguided, incredibly dedicated protector of women- I’m so glad she was formational in spreading modern feminism, but I have to double check what view of hers is cited. Sometimes she’s identifying a subtle pressure point in society as above, and sometimes she’s suggesting that men cannot have sex with women without being predatory, that heterosexual sex is inherently degrading to women and automatically statutory rape (obviously oversimplified). To be clear, I think that’s an interesting theory, and I can see using it as a thought experiment, but I think it’s very incorrect.