Asklemmy

43831 readers

876 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What's the general consensus on making private fediverse instances? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 year ago by testsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I feel like over the past few months, the main thing preventing me from getting super active in the fediverse has been all of the drama surrounding federation and instances shutting down.

I just want to be able to turn my brain off, and not have to think "Will this instance be around in 6 months?" every time I post.

As a result, I've been thinking about creating a Lemmy and/or Mastodon instance that is literally just me and no one else. No communities or anything, simply me posting to other instances via this private instance. And I know that this instance will stay alive and federated for as long as I keep hosting it.

However before I go through the effort of setting these up, I want to know what people think about private instances. Is this bad taste? Is it a logistical nightmare? Have people done this before? And what would the hardware requirements for a 1 user instance look like?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] danjones000@microwords.goodevilgenius.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The common term for this is "single user instance" and they're not at all uncommon.

I'm replying to you from my single user microblog.pub instance. It actually only works for a doctor user, and I've really liked it since I've started it.

I have no problems interacting with Mastodon, Pleroma, Misskey, etc. instances. It works with Lemmy as well as Mastodon does (which is to say, it works ok with Lemmy, but not ideal).

It uses a SQLite database, so, on my computer, I need Python to run the server, and nginx/caddy/Apache to proxy requests and handle https.

There are a few downsides. I host at home, so if my Internet goes down (which it does periodically), it's down. Also, Mastodon lets you follow hashtags, but that is somewhat useless on a single user instance, since all the posts coming in are from people I follow. Search is non-existent for me, since, again, it only knows about people and posts I've already interacted with.

I have a Lemmy account to do most of my interaction with Lemmy, and a Mastodon account on a somewhat large instance for searching, and for periodically browsing its local feed. But mostly, I spend my time on my own instance, and an very happy with it.

@testsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone @asklemmy@lemmy.ml

[–] danjones000@microwords.goodevilgenius.org 2 points 1 year ago

only works for a single user.

Stupid typo. Microblogpub doesn't yet have editing capability, which is one of its problems.

@testsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone @asklemmy@lemmy.ml