this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
91 points (100.0% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2315 readers
37 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Mastodon instances that I'm a member of have all preemptively defederated and I am very supportive. Just occurred to me we could still see the threads folks over here. What do you guys think? How does this instance feel about Meta?

EDIT: Admin response her https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/728123

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It would be nice to see meta's TOS concerning federation first. If it's not egregious, like Facebook, it would be good to volunteer an instance to connect with them, similar to putting a toe in the water.

I've just read through the Mastodon/Threads FAQ, and, so far, I'm ok with it.

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2023/07/what-to-know-about-threads/

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My biggest problem with that blog post is Eugene seems convinced that Mastodon's brand is sufficient enough to prevent EEE. I really think he is missing the fact that his own distaste for fairly popular features makes Mastodon fairly easy to poach users from.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What sort of features? I haven’t really used Mastodon as I was never much for Twitter.

[–] raktheundead@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Quote toots are the obvious one (although full disclosure: I don't like them either). Some instances and alternative Fediverse servers have a maximum character count substantially greater than that of Mastodon's default.

I can see keeping the character count low potentially having a technical advantage in terms of propagation time for posts.

[–] JakenVeina@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Quote toots

Yeah, I'mm'a need you to elaborate on that one.

See that’s one of the few things I know about Mastodon. They’re called Toots instead of Tweets. Why though, I could not tell you.

[–] raktheundead@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

Twitter has this thing where you can retweet something and add your own context to it. Eugen has resisted adding this to Mastodon for a long time, although I understand that it's in the works now, citing the tendency for the feature to be used as a way of getting one's followers to pile on somebody else's post. On the other hand, some communities have cited this as a very important way of how they've used the birdsite, although I don't understand how exactly and don't wish to mischaracterise their arguments.

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I know what you were trying to post but the image didn't attach.

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Weird, and thanks for letting me know, must be an issue of sharing between servers... I can see the pic from my side at this address but I just got notified about your comment, 8h after you posted it

[–] solarvector@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

TOS can change at their whim. Even if the TOS started out decent it would change as soon as they were established. Severing threads once the user base is entrenched would be much more difficult than not allowing federation from the start.