this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
529 points (77.0% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3137 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hegar@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

none matter as much as what Joe Biden has done to restore stability and decency to the presidency

I expect more from a president than just not being an incompetent criminal.

Obviously biden not being an incompetent criminal is a huge plus, but I'd be embarrassed to cheerlead someone who's greatest accomplishment is not being trump.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The article lists a slew of accomplishments that can be touted as the Biden administration's greatest, please feel free to read it.

I know that acting President-like is something that should be a bare minimum expectation of a President, but here we are. I won't lie there are a bunch of things I didn't like from Joe but there are a lot I do, the Infrastructure, Investment and Jobs Act is my top pick. It's the first step in a while that the U.S. got serious in funding public rail transport.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let's also not forget that the republicans are in a position to hinder any real progress. That's how the system is designed, unfortunately. Biden would have achieved much more had the republican party not been so strong, and the only way to fix that is forcefully at the ballots.

Americans always act like the presidential election is the only one that matters. Having the presidency only gives you so much if you can't rely on the senate.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The system was not designed that way. The filibuster is a self imposed rule that can be suspended and has been before.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And two shit bag "Democrats" fucked that prospect up, so what's the point of bringing it up now? Filibuster may be "self imposed," but when two wolves in sheep's clothing stop any meaningful attempt to nuke it from orbit to get shit done, it is a sad rule the rest of us get to suffer because.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I'm just talking about the system. It was designed for 50+1 on normal votes.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Why did you put scare quotes around Democrats? Manchin and Sinema are all the party is.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 2 points 10 months ago

The system is designed with the assumption that politically elected representatives would seek compromises in an attempt to reach what is best for the country, making sure it is very difficult for one fraction to get absolute political power.

The Republicans at some point realized the dominant strategy in this system, assuming their goal is power rather than the improvement of society, is to never compromise and to fuck everyone over at every option. The way the system is designed they are in a great position to do a lot of damage that way.