Melbourne

1864 readers

51 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

RustyRaven@aussie.zone

briongloid@aussie.zone

bot001@aussie.zone

Daily Discussion Thread: Mon 5 February 2024 (aussie.zone)

submitted 9 months ago by briongloid@aussie.zone to c/melbourne@aussie.zone

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TinyBreak@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

as a fraud control mechanism

So what, I'm expected to go out of my way to deliver it cause medicare cant figure out a better fraud system? Yeah... thats gonna be a no from me.

[–] prime_factor@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

Some of the trouble is that paying upfront does provide confirmation that you did visit the doctor and paid for them.

Whereas an IOU for the rebate doesn't necessarily provide the same confirmation that a patient received the services provided.

I do think PDVC could be improved though with a threshold amount, rather than being based upon the absolutes of an account being paid / unpaid. A $100 payment made already on an account is probably enough of the patient's money to indicate that they did receive the service.