this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
75 points (97.5% liked)

Games

16690 readers
474 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"This is plainly irrelevant."

"Then you must have a response!"

Wrong.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thing is, it's not irrelevant?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"People deserve to get fucked by DRM."

"No."

"But what about their operating system?!"

This is trolling.

I'm not interested.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If people buy games with DRM and don't update their OS to the point where it hasn't received a security update in years then hell yeah the problem is the consumer, not the company shutting the door to potential security issues!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

From day one, the problem is the DRM.

When a company forcibly updates a product so oven the versions that would work fine on your machine, don't, that's not your fault.

When that company actively prevents you from running the version your machine could plainly still run, as well (and safely) as it did yesterday, that's an abuse.