this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
602 points (95.1% liked)

Games

16752 readers
539 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
602
After Valve says no, Dwarf Fortress and Deep Rock Galactic devs unite to get "very serious" about their very silly demand for a dwarf tag on Steam, and they want your help (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 9 months ago by jonesy@aussie.zone to c/games@sh.itjust.works
98 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think the people with the condition are the ones who said the term can be offensive, which is why valve was not gung ho on using it.

I dont think its really up to you on if their opinion on their own insults is a bad take or not. Do you step in like this about other insults and slurs for other people?

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think if you bother to look for some of the conversations on the topic you'll find the community is quite divided on the term, in point of fact. There's nothing to stop any given individual being offended by literally anything; personally, I choose to respect someone if they ask me to refer to them in a particular way (or not), but that doesn't mean that person speaks for their entire community and it doesn't give them alone the sole right to blanket ban a word or concept.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one -3 points 9 months ago

So, to clarify.

You have a word that is hotly contested as pretty offensive to a group of people who deal with a lot of regular mockery and ridicule. A word so regularly debated on if it counts as reclaimed or insulting that it sounds like a conversation Ive had many many many times about such slurs as dyke, trannie, and faggot with other queer folk.

And youre shocked that a respectful company isnt chomping at the bit to use it to sell video games?

Just to make sure. Thats the stance you want to take right now?