this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
1957 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

5601 readers
3137 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Then why the hell did you bother asking for chapter and verse?

To point out that, even after the game of telephone, it still doesn't say what you claim it does.

I won't bother to go to a religion or guess "WWJD" for that; there are plenty of better moral frameworks and more consistent belief systems out there.

Which of those moral frameworks encourages antagonizing the beliefs of strangers?

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To point out that, even after the game of telephone, it still doesn’t say what you claim it does.

How so?

You still haven't claimed anything at all other than "WWJD is a good rule of thumb," with which I disagreed and provided examples of why I believe that WWJD is not a good moral or ethical model.

Which of those moral frameworks encourages antagonizing the beliefs of strangers?

Plenty of religions and secular moral frameworks value truth and honesty over protecting the feelings of others. Do I particularly care if I change your mind? No, you are entitled to your own beliefs and that's fine. However, I've seen enough evil done in the name of WWJD and "God's love" that I'm not going to ignore the questionable (and IMO irresponsible) claim that WWJD is a good moral framework when it's presented in a public venue where others might read it.

If you don't want to be challenged on it, keep your religion to yourself.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I disagreed and provided examples of why I believe that WWJD is not a good moral or ethical model.

You didn't though? You brought up a verse about swords taken wildly out of context. You seem to be confusing a general tendency for charity, tolerance, and forgiveness with the entire combined corpus of various sects. What evil has been done in the name of WWJD? Sure, the Catholic Church has been co-opted by bastards essentially since it's inception, and most other sects have their share of bastardry, but what does that have to do with emulating the most consistent elements of Jesus's teachings? Forgive your trespassers, help the struggling, love your neighbor as yourself.

And to be clear, it's not my religion. I do not profess to be a member of any Christian sect. I just think that most of the things Jesus himself said (or is purported to have said) are generally a good moral baseline. Further, based on his position on the Pharisees, I'm sure he himself would take serious issue with the evil done ostensibly in the name of his church. All the more support for WWJD.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Which of those moral frameworks encourages antagonizing the beliefs of strangers?

The parts when he says how they are going to hell? Or the part when he talked about a future time when his followers would murder those that opposed him.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think you misread the question.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just talking about the Gospel of Mark and Revelations. You know those two minor Christian works of no real significance.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

Didn't change the fact that you misread the question.