this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
30 points (89.5% liked)

Interesting Global News

2604 readers
317 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flathead@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Cue the outrage and two minutes hate.

[–] GONADS125@feddit.de 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Given that the painting is protected by glass, I don't really mind this protest. But I do hate when people destroy historical pieces in protest or like some stupid tourists have done in places like Italy.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I just don't see what its supposed to accomplish. You can't raise awareness when people are already aware that some form of problem exists and have preemptively demonized you.

[–] flathead@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right but these are climate change activists, not stupid tourists. The internet is going to hate on them anyway. The Mona Lisa! Sacre bleu!

[–] GONADS125@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, they were farming advocates. From the article:

The French capital has seen protests by farmers in recent days, calling for an end to rising fuel costs and for regulations to be simplified - on Friday they blocked key roads in and out of Paris.

And I was not indicating that protesters and dumb tourists destroying precious art are on the same level. But there are other ways to draw attention to crises than destroying historic artifacts.

I don't support that, regardless the cause.

[–] flathead@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I stand corrected, thanks. I assumed they were climate activists, since all the previous soup throwing was about climate.

Do you know of any instances where climate protestors have destroyed historic artifacts?

[–] GONADS125@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

Just to play devils advocate, I decided to try to see if there were many instances of artwork actually being damaged. I found this article documenting the many "attacks" on artwork by climate protesters.

It does an excellent job illustrating how unjustified the outrage is, documenting how the attacks don't damage the artwork.

[–] GONADS125@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah I assumed the same thing before reading the article.

I believe people have done similar things to unprotected artwork. I think I remember that happened here in the US at some point in recent years.

Just to be clear, I was saying from the beginning that I don't really see the harm in this because the painting was protected by glass.

My point in bringing that up was just to argue that people being outraged by this are unjustified in my opinion, as there was no damage done to the painting.

I was acknowledging that outrage would be justified if it were to actually cause damage; I wasn't insinuating that climate protesters were notorious for damaging artwork.