Data Is Beautiful

6884 readers

202 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

satur@lemmy.ml

otter@lemmy.ca

514

New gender gap (lemmy.ml)

submitted 9 months ago by BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

390 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So we should just let 'minorities' suffer? The term appeasement comes to mind, as I don't know what else you could be advocating here.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why not both? Benefit to minorities and benefit to majorities.

This isn't a zero sum game.

[–] Glitchington@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Let me get this straight, if you have food to survive, and someone else who doesn't have food wants some food, not even your food, just some food, you need more food before they get any at all?

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did .. did you even read my post? What is going on?

Let me re-write it using your analogy.

Why not both? Food for minorities and food for majorities.

This isn’t a zero sum game.

[–] Glitchington@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Everyone should have food, my point is, the majority shouldn't get extra food just because the minority are getting enough food now.