this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39019 readers
3193 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Decades after a sacred mosque was violently demolished by Hindu nationalists, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has unveiled a brand new temple on the site, which has been at the centre of a centuries-long religious rift.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Haagel@lemmings.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The headline is a bit misleading. The temple was built at the site of a destroyed mosque, which was built at the site of a destroyed temple.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

According to Hindu nationalists, Baqi destroyed a pre-existing temple of Rama at the site. The existence of this temple is a matter of controversy.

The Archaeological Survey of India conducted an excavation of the disputed site on the orders of the Allahabad High Court.

The report of the excavation concluded that there were the ruins of "a massive structure" beneath the ruins of the mosque which was "indicative of remains which are distinctive features found associated with the temples of north India", but found no evidence that the structure was specifically demolished for the construction of the Babri Masjid.

Edited for clarity*

From the sounds of that, it’s not exactly the same situation as deliberately destroying one’s place of worship for another.

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 1 points 9 months ago

No the archaeological survey result just mean it's inconclusive whether the situation is exactly same or not. No evidence doesn't necessarily mean it didn't happen, it just that we don't know for sure if it happebd or not.