this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
549 points (97.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54565 readers
511 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don't disagree, but isn't there something to be said for denying people access to the popular culture based on their ability to pay for it?

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

Most places will still have OTA broadcasts of content, at least from the major networks. That is still "free" but cable/digital TV prices are ridiculous.

Where I live there are no digital broadcast stations available so expensive subscription TV or piracy are the best options.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not particularly. Things generally cost money. It's not a human rights violation to say you can't see a movie if you have zero dollars.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

So then we don't worry about people's ability to engage in their communities through shared experiences and exposure to arts and culture, we just leave people out? Exclude them if they're poor. I don't think I care for that to be honest.