this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
253 points (95.7% liked)

Gaming

20010 readers
557 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You don't necessarily need a lawyer on-hand to figure out "legally distinct". Everything that Nintendo has taken down before has blatantly used the name and existing characters in both name and likeness. Even if the core idea when they started the game was "pokemon but with guns" - which I doubt - it's still a good start in the vein of "inspired by" instead of "ripping off" and I bet Nintendo knows this otherwise Palworld would have been hit just as quickly as the mod was considering this is a company who made themselves infamous for going after youtubers making let's plays of a basic racing game. They're famously litigious so they're going to be watching Pocketpair and Palworld like vultures after their next meal but either Pocketpair are more careful than they'd like the public to believe or their idea is different enough from the get-go that Nintendo will never get anything on them.