this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
1564 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

9965 readers
358 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A future-of-work expert said Gen Zers didn't have the "promise of stability" at work, so they're putting their personal lives and well-being first.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, if you've got a high-paying job then you have the means to not have to prioritize work. Hopefully, that remains constant over the next several decades.

But how many Gen Z'ers are in that position?

We keep seeing articles about Gen Z'ers not being able to afford rent, let alone food and other basic comforts. They are, or will be, forced to put work first. Not just working harder to get the luxuries of their grandparents or parents, but working harder to scrape by.

And I don't even see and end to this. Corporations will eventually abolish retirement, because very few will be able to retire the way things keep going.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think the idea is that a lot of people prioritize only their work. The whole hustle grindset thing, working obscene hours to try to get rich. Instead of doing that, seeing that whole rat race for what it is, doing enough work to get by, and then actually enjoying your time elsewhere seems to be what this is advocating for.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think the idea is that a lot of people prioritize only their work.

Is this really a thing? Has it ever been for the masses?

Sure, people might prioritize work over anything else when they are young, but that's often necessary to secure a future.

Other people live to work, but that's pretty rare.

Instead of doing that, seeing that whole rat race for what it is, doing enough work to get by, and then actually enjoying your time elsewhere seems to be what this is advocating for.

I thought that what most people do. Does anyone actually believe that working hard at their low-paying job is going to make them rich? I thought that idea was dead decades ago.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just look at the hustle grindset, or sigma grind, or whatever you want to call it. No, most people aren't working 120 hours a week at a McDonald's, but a lot more are getting multiple jobs, side hustles, etc to get to "get ahead" in the game.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

To get ahead or to get by? Nobody who's grinding two or three jobs is wealthy, and I think they're only doing it to pay the bills because a single job doesn't cut it anymore.

I've spoken with uber drivers who already have a "good job" but they need money to support their parents who are living with them, perhaps multiple kids, etc. It really sucks to be in that situation because work is all you do.