[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3206 readers

1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No self-promotion.
No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
No trolling.
Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Sunshine@lemmy.ca

Ceres@lemmy.world

115

Ford is cutting F-150 Lightning production due to waning demand (www.engadget.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/evs@lemmy.world

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I think Ford’s bigger problem is that the R1T is a cooler truck that costs about the same.

[–] joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

There's something about the front of the R1T that I despise. It looks like a child designed it, but it looks significantly better than the cyber truck.

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I hate it because you can't see 20 feet in front of you. My friends got an R1 and like it, but admit that the hood is so high and flat that they can't see if their own kids are in front of them.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

I hate thar trend in newer cars for the hoods to keep getting higher and boxier. It sucks for driver visibility and is even worse for pedestrian safety.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't they fix that by getting rid of the frunk?

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Probably, but the boxy hood/grille are 100% an aesthetic choice and wouldn't be required regardless of whether it had a frunk or had an ICE under the hood.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The headlights.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

It looks like an enemy in a mario game.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

After driving both I went with the lightning.

The R1T is cool. It’s a single person camping truck all the way. A little smaller, more capable of getting in and out of tight places that are predominately Jeep accessible. But the center rear seat is very uncomfortable, the payload capacity is lower both size and weight wise, and for me being forced in to one pedal driving was not ideal.

The lightning is wider, and heavier. But also more comfortable for everyone inside, can tow better, and I have loved having the power options, no need for a generator.

The audiences are similar but a bit different. I do think that Ford is nuts for saying there’s no demand. Make the ER pro for 50k and you could sell them all day. But you can’t even order that option, much less get it for that price. Maybe it costs more than to produce, but I’m willing to bet not. They would just need to be able to sell them direct to public to make it worth it and most states don’t allow for it.

[–] Stillhart@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

and for me being forced in to one pedal driving was not ideal.

I don't know anyone with an EV who hasn't eventually moved to one pedal driving. It's one of those things that you think feels weird at first but once you try it for a few days you never want to go back.

Make the ER pro for 50k and you could sell them all day. But you can’t even order that option, much less get it for that price.

This is the obvious issue. They marked the base model up by $12k before it ever came out and then didn't make any. I would have one right now if I could get one for $40k like they said originally and I don't even like trucks!

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait you mean no brake pedal? Does letting off the gas effectively brake?

I know they have regen braking but so does my hybrid and it behaves nothing like that.

[–] jnovinger@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

There's a brake pedal, but it's almost never needed (and if it is, it's always been because of me being stupid). Releasing the accelerator engages the regenerative breaking, up to and including coming to a stop. I love it and don't ever want to go back.

Having said that, I have had zero problem adapting back to normal breaking in my wife's car (ICE) when I need to drive it for some reason.

I really don't understand people that complain about the 1-pedal driving.