this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
914 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Following his trial for defamation of the families of the children and school staff killed in the Sandy Hook massacre, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is using Valve Corp.’s Steam, the world’s largest digital distribution platform for PC games, to sell an Infowars-themed video game. Jones claims to have earned hundreds of thousands in revenue from the video game, yet he has refused to pay the Sandy Hook families. Alex Jones: NWO Wars also mirrors and cartoonishly repackages the conspiracy theorist’s regularly violent, hateful rhetoric despite the platform’s policies against hate speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Why not? It’s not like the kids are going to boycott them. Boycotts are only for easy to refuse things. Or things that sound good in a instagram post.

Not for actual thinks they like and can’t live without.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's how boycotts have always worked. Boycotts have only been successful when people already didn't like the thing they were boycotting.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I looovvveee tollhouse cookies, crunch bars, KitKats and stouffer’s French bread pizzas but I still don’t buy them, even though they are like the only people to make a wide range of frozen dinners, and I am not even a little bit salty about it, definitely, not at all…

So yeah, some people do stick to their morals over creature comforts.

Even when it really sucks.

I did just remember Schwann’s is a thing though, so maybe nestle is good for something at least.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

And you're just one person. Clearly, your boycott is ineffective against Nestlé. Nestlé seems to be doing fine.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

ROFL…. So boycotts are only for people who lack the balls to stand up against the things they like?

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes and no. They're obviously more universal, but historically, they only actually work against things people already don't like.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True… god I hate people so much.

[–] sandwichfiend@c0tt0n.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago

You’re stalking me now? I’ve reported all of your spam comments- including the ones you deleted.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Valve allowing that dingus to sell a game while refusing to pay his victims families?

Sounds like a good reason to boycott to me.

But no one will.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Oh, I understand now! Yes, that would be an excellent reason for a boycott, but it never works because people never seem to be willing to sacrifice even the smallest amount of convenience for the greater good. I'd be in, and a lot of others probably would be too, but how does one even organize something like that? I think that's another part of the problem. For a boycott to work, it has to be well planned and organized.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

I boycott Nestlé, and I have ran into someone in the world who does the same.

So in my little town if there is a chance that the two of us ran into each other at the same Walmart, right as I was explaining to my kid why we couldn’t buy that type of bottled water, I think that there are a bunch of us boycotting nestle while unorganized.

Overtime cents add up to dollars, even if we can’t bring them down, we can still help them not grow as quickly.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Exactly my thoughts. Well said. Though, under normal circumstances, people would be absolutely outraged by this and the shockwave would be spreading across all platforms to boycott immediately-

but mUh gAmEz?!

So…. It won’t happen.