this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)
Public Health
375 readers
3 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (📍)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
These things use light to see through the skin. I think this physician should take it up with the laws of physics, unless of course, the O2 sensor said it could equally read through all skin types. But we are pretty much warned about this happening.. if someone died under your care and O2 monitoring was needed I don’t think this is the blood gas test you should have relied on…
In the article, it says the company states there was no significant difference in readings between black and white skin. The physician suing believes the original study is flawed because the company's tests were only conducted on healthy people in ideal lab settings.
A part of the reason why the physician is suing is because they believe there should be warnings that these may be inaccurate for black people.
Would a stronger or different wavelength light work better on melanin-rich skin?
Has the industry done any research on how to make it work better?
Or is it like crash tests that don't even bother having a dummy which represents a woman? "If I don't have any data, I don't need to spend money on improving my product"?
Not sure, not a physicist all we get told as students is that it might have a less reliable effect on darker skin tones.
Not sure.
They know it won’t work as well because we also happen to know.