this post was submitted on 12 May 2022
25 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
346 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

For personal computing, sure. That's not full ludite, we've basically reached a point where most things a person does on their computer can be done well with a $500 laptop or phone.

For servers, media rendering, hash cracking, prime searching, machine-learning training, video and image enhancement, medical simulations and other applications, we still love more power.

[–] ree@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Most of ML industrial application are just fluff, I don't need my bank, my social network and my governement to profile me nor predict my behavior... And entertainment industry can tell beautiful stories with or without computers.

The only legit application imo is medical research which has positive outcome on people lives but then I'm sure that if the gafam repurposed their massive tracking infrastructure we're good for a while.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Those applications you listed are fluff, but there are a significant amount of others ('most' or not, I don't know) that aren't fluff. Medical research, other engineering research, accessibility tools. I appreciate GAN content upscaling and de-noising for older art, but that's a more personal case.

I do think it's unfortunate that we live in a system that encourages powerful tools to be absolutely wasted on fluff.

[–] ree@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Couldn't have put it better than your last sentence.

Have a nice day :)

load more comments (1 replies)