Natural Philosophy
A community for anyone interested in big questions and meta-questions pertaining to the natural world. For the purpose of this community, natural philosophy encompasses philosophy of science and metaphysics as well.
For those of you on Matrix, there is a super-space which tries to aggregate scientific chat rooms and spaces at #science-space:matrix.org, including a room for philosophy of science and a physics space.
Moderation: Submissions and comments are moderated on a subjective case-by-case basis to facilitate and maintain a healthy, pleasant, and rewarding environment for anyone with a genuine interest in learning, participating, or merely lurking. Just to state some obvious (non-exhaustive set of) behaviours and content we won't have here: bigotry; hate speech; sealioning; strawmen; pseudo-/anti-science; dis-/misinformation. Additional context may be taken into consideration as well.
view the rest of the comments
I'm not sure exactly which paper he was referring to, but here are some relevant ones:
Someone named O. Stoica has published a refutation (but I haven't read it yet): Refutation of Hilbert Space Fundamentalism (2021). They call it "Hilbert-Space Fundamentalism", but I feel like that has a negative ring to it, given the connotations of the word "fundamentalism".