this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
1349 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45891 readers
1679 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunfoil@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Why would I pay YouTube that when I can give it directly to the creators though. I'll just adblock and not put money in the hands of Google, while helping the creators more.

[–] straypet@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Without the content delivery system, creators don't really have a way to share their creations with you.

[–] Sunfoil@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

YouTube is far from the only video hosting site, and far from the only way to do it. Peertube, Vimeo, Patreon, Floatplane, Nebula, bitchute to name some examples of sites already set up, with monetisation, with youtube creators actively posting on them. Twitch rivals like Kick and Rumble could also absolutely pivot into taking YTs market share too

[–] ReadingCat@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I mean without YouTube/ Google the alternative for most creators would be to host the videos themselves. And then you would have like 20 Sites which you had to check yourself regularly to get new videos. I get that YouTube isn't the best solution, but the alternative is much worse. There is a reason why we don't all still have our own small WordPress blogs.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yep. And if you look at video platforms that actually have to pay for their own bandwidth (Floatplane by LTT), you're going to end up paying $5 PER CREATOR. Hosting video on Vimeo is also super expensive.

[–] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You know, RSS exists to literally circumvent this problem, albeit for articles. A lot of sites still have it, people just forgot that this is a thing. Little bit of a chore to setup, but its actually pretty nice. Obviously finding these sites is the hard part, but a good search engine (kagi btw) could make it work.

Also PeerTube exists as well, which reduces the cost of hosting videos.

[–] Titou@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"most creators would be to host the videos themselves."

And where the problem is ?

[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago

The Venn Diagram of "people with web hosting skills", "people with content generation skills", and "people who want to do this" is basically zero.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why would I pay YouTube that when I can give it directly to the creators though.

Do you?